Skip to content

IELTS Speaking 4 min read

Ten IELTS Speaking Mistakes That Are Easy to Stop Making

Most lost Speaking marks come from habits rather than language gaps: memorised answers, self-correction, one-word replies, answering the wrong question, and silence instead of natural fillers.

Most marks lost in IELTS Speaking are not lost to missing English. They are lost to habits — things candidates do under pressure that cost more than the underlying language gap would.

The ten below account for most of it, and each has a specific fix.

1. Memorised answers

The problem: A rehearsed paragraph about your hometown, delivered word for word.

Memorised speech is audible. The rhythm flattens, the vocabulary jumps a level above the surrounding speech, and the delivery does not respond to the actual question. Examiners are trained to notice, and a memorised answer cannot be credited as a sample of your own English.

The fix: Prepare ideas, not scripts. Know that you can talk about your neighbourhood, your commute and your local market — do not write the sentences in advance.

2. Constant self-correction

The problem: "I go — I went — sorry, I have been going there since…"

This costs more than the original error did. Grammar has already recorded the slip; repairing it adds a Fluency penalty on top.

The fix: If the meaning is clear, keep going. Correct once, briefly, only when the error genuinely obscures what you meant.

3. One-word answers

The problem: "Do you like cooking?" "Yes."

There is nothing to assess. Every short answer reduces the evidence the examiner has.

The fix: Answer, then give a reason. Two or three sentences in Part 1, longer later. If you are stuck, contrast with the past — "I didn't use to, but recently…"

4. Answering a different question

The problem: The examiner asks did you enjoy something as a child, and you answer in the present tense about now.

The fix: Listen to the auxiliary verb at the start of the question and mirror it. Do you → present. Did you → past. Have you → present perfect. Would you → conditional. This one habit removes a large share of Part 1 errors.

5. Silence instead of a filler

The problem: Four seconds of nothing while you think.

Silence reads as a breakdown; a natural filler does not.

The fix: Build a small set of genuine English fillers — well, actually, I suppose, to be honest, the thing is. Two or three across an answer is natural. Six sounds rehearsed.

6. Treating Part 3 like Part 1

The problem: Part 3 asks about society; you answer about your own family in two sentences.

The fix: Notice the shift. Part 1 is about you, Part 3 is about people in general. Answers should be roughly twice as long and should argue rather than describe. See the Part 3 guide.

7. Stopping early in Part 2

The problem: Forty-five seconds of a two-minute long turn.

The fix: Practise with a timer until two minutes feels normal, and learn the four extension moves — describe the setting, say how you felt, compare it with something similar, explain why it mattered. Any one of those adds twenty seconds.

8. Thesaurus vocabulary

The problem: "I am enthralled by ocular entertainment."

Words used outside their normal collocation are marked as errors, not as range.

The fix: Build topic vocabulary rather than synonym lists. The ordinary words that belong to a topic — deadline, commute, workload, shift — demonstrate more range than rare words used wrongly.

9. Flat delivery

The problem: Every word given equal stress, no intonation movement.

Pronunciation is assessed on intelligibility, stress, rhythm and intonation. A monotone reduces clarity even when every sound is accurate.

The fix: Shadow recordings for five minutes a day — play a short clip and speak along with it, copying the rhythm rather than the individual sounds.

10. Trying to give the "right" answer

The problem: Searching for the opinion the examiner wants.

There is no right answer. The content of your views is not scored at all. Time spent deciding what to think is time not spent producing English.

The fix: Say the first reasonable thing and develop it. If you genuinely have no view, say so and reason aloud — "I have not thought about this before, but my first instinct would be…" is a perfectly good answer.

Two things that are not mistakes

Asking for repetition. "Sorry, could you say that again?" is normal, is not penalised, and is much better than answering a question you did not hear.

Disagreeing. The examiner is not stating opinions. Disagreeing with the premise of a question, politely and with a reason, often produces better language than agreeing blandly.

Finding out which ones you make

Record a full practice test — all three parts, no stopping. Then listen back once for each of these:

  1. How many times did I correct myself?
  2. How many answers were one sentence?
  3. Did I reach two minutes in Part 2?
  4. Did any answer use the wrong tense for the question?
  5. Was there any silence longer than three seconds?

Write the counts down. Almost everyone finds two or three of the ten dominate, and fixing those two or three is worth more than working on all ten at once.

Now put it into practice

Try it on your own work

Frequently asked questions

Can examiners tell if my answer is memorised?

Usually yes. Memorised speech has a different rhythm and vocabulary level from spontaneous speech, and the shift when a candidate moves from a rehearsed section to a real one is very audible.

Is it bad to ask the examiner to repeat a question?

No. Asking for repetition is normal and is not penalised. Silence is far more costly, so a natural request is always the better choice when you did not catch something.

Should I use big words to impress the examiner?

No. Lexical Resource rewards precision and appropriate collocation. A misused rare word is marked as an error, while a well-chosen common word is not.

What if I run out of things to say in Part 2?

Add detail rather than stopping: describe the setting, say how you felt, compare it with something similar, or explain why it stayed with you. Each of those can extend an answer by twenty seconds.

Written and reviewed by the Intellecta team

Checked against the published assessment criteria. How we write and review guides.

Intellecta is an independent practice platform. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or connected to the organisations that own or administer IELTS or TOEFL. Practice results and AI feedback are study indicators, not official scores. See our editorial policy and AI feedback methodology.

Study assistant Drag or click